|
Solid, semi-tubular and
tubular rivets are widely used mechanical fasteners. These
specific types of rivets are
employed in a wide variety of products which may require flexible
joints or tightly joined mating components. Typical solid rivets
include flat head, pan head, round head and shoulder type rivets.
The head may be of various shapes and the shank must be of
sufficient length to accommodate the thickness of the parts to be
joined and to allow for the formation of the clinch head. Solid
rivets are available in many metals and alloys to meet today's
requirements of tensile and shear strength, electrical conductivity,
corrosion resistance, appearance and cost. Flat head, pan head and
button head rivets are more commonly used for tightly joining mating
components. Shoulder-type rivets are normally used for pivoting or
hinging joints. A basic requirement of the rivet is that the
material must be able to withstand rigorous cold-working without
deterioration and provide the desired standards of finish and
appearance. Two of the most common types of steels used in rivet
manufacturing are SAE 1010 from which cold-headed rivets are made
and B1113, or screw machine steel. Brass, nickel-silver, bronze,
copper, stainless steel and aluminum alloys are also widely used. In
the case of rivets made from SAE 1010, the clinch head can be easily
formed and will provide excellent appearance. Rivets of B1113 steel
do not lend themselves nearly as well to the riveting process and on
this type of rivet the formed closure is usually ragged around the
edge and has a poor appearance. There are four principal ways to
clinch solid, semi-tubular rivets or studs-staking, spin roller
forming, orbital forming, and radial forming. Each of these have
variations in tooling and technique. Each has advantages and
disadvantages.
|
|
|
Staking operations cover a
wide range of techniques and applications. Staking in general is a
fast low-cost method of heading solid, semi-tubular rivets or
studs where a head with a smooth finish is not required. The
operation is most likely performed in a press or a rivet setting
machine, and clinch formed with a tool having a shaped face. The
tool does not revolve. Tool pressure alone reshaped or cuts back
the rivet shank, rather than flowing the metal. Speed and low
costs are the principal advantages of staking. The performance
cycle is rapid, and tools and equipment are of the simplest kinds.
A disadvantage is the lack of holding strength in the staked end.
Hence, the method is not recommended for parts which must resist
pulling apart in the direction of the rivet and resist high torque
on the head. The appearance of a staked rivet is not compatible
with high quality work.
|
|
|
Twin Spin Roller
Forming of clinch head: -achieved with Twin-Spin tooling
is designed to utilize the combined forces of motion and pressure.
The Twin-Spin tool consists of two matching, precision shaped,
hardened and polished steel rollers. These are contained in a tool
holder just slightly larger than the diameter of the work piece. The
rollers distribute a combination of forces which flow the material
to the desired shape and size. The material is flowed from the
center outward, in a radial series of overlapping waves. Since the
material is flowed continuously in these two directions, spin roller
forming produces the highest quality grain structure, head
integrity, and uniformity of head structure. In a typical Twin-Spin
application such as head-forming on rivets, pins, or staking posts,
the tool is brought down on the area to be formed. The free-spinning
rollers, driven by contact with the work piece, rotate counter to
each other. The two rollers always work diametrically opposed, thus
counter balancing each other and applying negligible torque or
bending movement to the work piece. Tightness of the fastener -
either loose to provide free movement of the assembled parts, or
tight to prevent movement - is controlled by roller shape and the
amount of pressure applied. Because of the high degree of control
achievable with this method of forming, there is no deformation of
the pin or the fastener shank. The tightness of the rivet in the
joint can be controlled within close limits and with excellent
repeatability. Surface finish is polished in appearance, and head
integrity is excellent. The maximum shank diameter of the work piece
is limited only by the output of the power head. Depending on size
or material, forming cycle time ranges between one quarter to one
second. Possible disadvantages of this method for certain classes
of work may be the relatively large diameters of the roller tools,
which prevent riveting in extremely close quarters, or the need to
use a lubricant with some materials. Carbide tooling is supplied
when lubricants can not be used. All Grant Riveter's automatically
supply a very thin film of lubrication to the hidden side of the
twin spin roll forming die's. Lubrication greatly increases life
beyond belief. One set of rollers made from Grant's coated high
grade tool steel or made from carbide have been tested in high-end
production environments where the dies produced production for over
a year.
|
|
|
Orbital Forming
is also commonly used in producing heads on rivets, pins, or posts.
Orbital tools are composed of a rotating tool holder and a shaped
tool insert. The axis of the tool insert has a definite angular
relationship to the axis of the tool holder. The forming end of the
insert is located at the intersection of these two axes. The insert
does not rotate when in contact with the work piece, and as a
result, describes a concentric, conical path…. very much like a top
beginning to run out. The rivet or pin being worked, is "set" by a
combination of pressure, high speed spinning action of the holder,
and conical rotary motion. The operation is quiet and produces
joints and heads of high quality, at high cycle speeds. Design of
tools can be adapted to work in close quarter. Orbital tools can be
adjusted to produce a tight or loose assembly, and lubricants may be
required for a better finish. Orbital tooling is generally set up to
produce extremely tight assemblies where no movement is acceptable.
The disadvantage of the orbital forming process is that the
initial tool holder is relatively expensive. However, tool inserts -
although more expensive than Twin-Spin rolls- have excellent life.
The grain structure of orbital formed heads is not of the quality
obtained with Twin-Spin rolls and radial forming. The rivet or pin
being worked in an orbital form technique, can not be headed without
deformation of the shank under the formed head. The cosmetic's are
generally very good. |
|
|
Radial Forming
is another popular process used in producing heads on rivets, pins
or post. Different than the circular motion of the orbital tool,
radial riveting passes the tool through a rosette forming pattern.
Each rosette path or loop pass through the center, the longitudinal
axis of the riveting tool always overlaps the center of the rivet.
The material is spread radial from the center outward and looping
inward rather than around the center. According to the practitioner
the rivet material is spread in a radial manner or formed
tangentially overlapping. The operation is quiet and produces joints
and heads of high quality and slightly polished in appearance. The
tools can be adapted to work in close quarter. Radial forming can be
adjusted to produce a tight or loose fastener. The grain structure
of a radial formed head is not as high in quality as spin roller
formed heads. The control of a joint can be held within limits
slightly better than orbital forming but falls short of Grant's Twin
Spin roller forming process. The Grant process is much quicker with
better results.
Complexity of radial motion
generation is considered by some as a process disadvantage. Other
problems encountered are: poor power train wear factors under heavy
forming condition; forming tools cost more to manufacture than
orbital tool inserts; The rivet or pin being worked, can not be
headed without some deformation to the fastener shank; cosmetic
appearance is only fair to good; length of forming pass increases
cycle time considerably.
|
|
|
In conclusion,
all four principal ways to clinch form solid, semi-tubular rivets or
studs by staking, spin-roller forming, orbital forming and or
radial forming, all have advantages and disadvantages. Each process
has unique results in its capabilities. There is no one best process that
meets the needs of all heading operations.
|
|
|
Grant Riveters Method is the
“Tailor-Made” System of Fitting the Machine to the Job - rather
than the common practice of attempting to fit the job to some
standard stock model Riveter. For that reason the comprehensive
Grant line includes all of the recognized methods of riveting.
The "Grant" Solution
provides the most cost effective way to form or fasten a rivet or
component without hindering the performance or the integrity of the
rivet or part being fastened. "Grant" employs several processes all
adaptable within a single portable power-head riveter.
Any "Grant" power-head or bench-top riveter can accept orbital, twin-spin™ roller,
multi-spin™ roller and spin-press™ burnishing. Riveting has
grown into an age of modularity and portable riveters.
|
|
|
There are two basic
power head designs that assure a future for riveting
assembly.
The first is a power-head in which the pneumatically,
hydraulically or servo-electric advanced piston encloses a precision
spindle and bearing shaft assembly. This one design feature allows
us to manufacture a durable head, simple to maintain, low in initial
cost and economical in operation. The Grant power-head is the
only unit in the world that is hard chromed internally and offered
with advance hard coated tooling. On average our units will run 6
to 10 million cycles or more without needing parts replaced. This
is why we offer a standard two-year factory warranty. The
competition will offer you an extra set of bearings. Do you
consider this a good warranty never the less a guarantee?
The second is a power-head
in which the pneumatically or hydraulically operated piston has a
complex eccentric shaft arrangement built within the piston. This
spindle assembly drives a gear arrangement, which controls the
radial rosette forming pattern. The forming tool must complete 360
degrees around the rivet shank. Because of its complexity
maintenance of this type head, along with its high initial cost,
remain operational concerns which must be over come. One of the
units advantages is that due to minimal side loads it can be
operated with simple low cost support fixtures.
|
|